On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 06:04:54PM +0100, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
> Update s390x_vr_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR() to include a non-zero vmalloc_start
> check, making it consistent with s390x_generic_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR().
>
> Fixes: d0164e7e480a ("s390x: uncouple physical and virtual memory spaces")
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <[email protected]>
> ---
> s390x.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/s390x.c b/s390x.c
> index 0e8e2b3..1117bf0 100644
> --- a/s390x.c
> +++ b/s390x.c
> @@ -724,13 +724,13 @@ static ulong s390x_vr_PTOV(ulong paddr)
> {
> return paddr + machdep->identity_map_base;
> }
>
> static int s390x_vr_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR(ulong vaddr)
> {
> - return (vaddr >= vt->vmalloc_start && vaddr < machdep->kvbase);
> + return (vt->vmalloc_start && vaddr >= vt->vmalloc_start && vaddr <
> machdep->kvbase);
> }
>
> ulong s390x_VTOP(ulong vaddr)
> {
> return machdep->machspec->virt_to_phys(vaddr);
> }
Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
