Yes, it is envisaged.
2007/10/2, Beber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > For doing some backup for my own purpose I was in need to backup a > sqlite file. I get some interesing results. > > This sqlite is about 20 MB and 164913 lines : > > % ls -lh /var/spool/bogofilter/wordlist.db > -rw------- 1 mail mail 20M 2007-10-02 11:11 > /var/spool/bogofilter/wordlist.db > > After having compress it, it is : > > % cp /var/spool/bogofilter/wordlist.db /tmp > % bzip2 -9p /tmp/wordlist.db > % ls -lh /tmp/wordlist.db.bz2 > -rw------- 1 root root 6.0M 2007-10-02 12:30 /tmp/wordlist.db.bz2 > > Size decrease by about a factor 3. Not so bad. Then see next phase. > > Then, I tried to dump base : > > % sqlite3 /var/spool/bogofilter/wordlist.db .dump > /tmp/wordlist.sqlite > % ls -lh /tmp/wordlist.sqlite > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15M 2007-10-02 12:33 /tmp/wordlist.sqlite > > After compressing it (just text there) : > > % bzip2 -9p /tmp/wordlist.sqlite > % ls -lh /tmp/wordlist.sqlite.bz2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.1M 2007-10-02 12:33 /tmp/wordlist.sqlite.bz2 > > Here we decrease the size by ~19 the original size ! > > Maybe could we use that way in the else repo managment ? > > -- > Beber > > -- ==== Eric PINCON
