devel  

Messages by Thread

• Fedora-Cloud-34-20220129.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-35-20220129.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE not defined errors Bob Hepple
  • Re: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE not defined errors Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
  • Re: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE not defined errors Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE not defined errors Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• spirv-tools ftbfs no idea what the compiler is telling me. David Airlie
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-01-24 Fedora QA Meeting Adam Williamson
• Self Introduction: Chris Rapier rapier
  • Re: Self Introduction: Chris Rapier Demi Marie Obenour
  • Re: Self Introduction: Chris Rapier Chris Rapier
• Unexpected Fedora Mass Rebuild Failures Ravindra Kumar
  • Re: Unexpected Fedora Mass Rebuild Failures Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• botan2 soname bump Benjamin Kircher
• java-17-openjdk mass-rebuild for f36 in copr III (last one) Jiri Vanek
• Updates failed to push, may need manual operation from releng Qiyu Yan
  • Re: Updates failed to push, may need manual operation from releng Richard Shaw
  • Re: Updates failed to push, may need manual operation from releng Ankur Sinha
  • Re: Updates failed to push, may need manual operation from releng Qiyu Yan
• FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Martin Gansser
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Mamoru TASAKA
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Martin Gansser
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Martin Gansser
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Mamoru TASAKA
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Mamoru TASAKA
  • Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr Martin Gansser
• Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service? Barry Scott
  • Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service? Barry Scott
  • Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service? Tomasz Torcz
  • Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service? Barry Scott
  • Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service? Robert-André Mauchin
• Fedora-Cloud-34-20220128.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-35-20220128.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• libvpx soname bump 6.3.0 -> 7.0.0 Tom Callaway
• `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Christoph Erhardt
  • Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Florian Weimer
  • Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Florian Weimer
  • Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Christoph Erhardt
  • Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Florian Weimer
  • Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64 Christoph Erhardt
• Fedora-Rawhide-20220127.n.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL David Sommerseth
  • Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL Neal Gompa
  • Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL David Sommerseth
  • Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL Neal Gompa
  • Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL David Sommerseth
  • Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL Neal Gompa
• [Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.16 is underway Sumantro Mukherjee
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing rawhide
  • Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing Peter Boy
  • Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing Adam Williamson
• Fedora-Cloud-34-20220127.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Fabio Valentini
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Vít Ondruch
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Vít Ondruch
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Vít Ondruch
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Vít Ondruch
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Ralf Corsépius
  • Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded Richard W.M. Jones
• Fedora-Cloud-35-20220127.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• golang-salsa-debian-vasudev-gospake2 license change Maxwell G via devel
• RFE: CMake AutoRequires? Kevin Kofler via devel
  • Re: RFE: CMake AutoRequires? Dan Čermák
  • Re: RFE: CMake AutoRequires? Kevin Kofler via devel
  • Re: RFE: CMake AutoRequires? Miro Hrončok
• Self Introduction: Matthew Davis Matthew Davis
  • Re: Self Introduction: Matthew Davis Dan Čermák
• No response to pull requests Kai A. Hiller
  • Re: No response to pull requests Miro Hrončok
  • Re: No response to pull requests Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
• gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Adam Williamson
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Ben Beasley
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Kaleb Keithley
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Sérgio Basto
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Sérgio Basto
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Thomas Haller
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Sérgio Basto
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Thomas Haller
  • Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Adam Williamson
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Adam Williamson
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Milan Crha
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Adam Williamson
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Peter Robinson
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Kevin Kofler via devel
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Matthew Miller
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Neal Gompa
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Christian Stadelmann
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Ondřej Holý
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Christian Stadelmann
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Ondřej Holý
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Lennart Poettering
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Florian Weimer
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Lennart Poettering
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Florian Weimer
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Lennart Poettering
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Demi Marie Obenour
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Michael Catanzaro
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Demi Marie Obenour
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Lennart Poettering
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Dominique Martinet
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Adam Williamson
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Robbie Harwood
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Neal Gompa
  • Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing? Kevin Kofler via devel
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-01-27 17:00 UTC) James Antill
• Picking a new time for the Prioritized Bugs meeting Ben Cotton
  • Re: Picking a new time for the Prioritized Bugs meeting Luna Jernberg
• Weird bodhi push messages Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Weird bodhi push messages Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: Weird bodhi push messages Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: Weird bodhi push messages Richard W.M. Jones
• Orphaned package - hatch Lumír Balhar
• Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (January 2022 Edition) Fabio Valentini
  • Re: [Rust] Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (January 2022 Edition) Rémi Lauzier via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-34-20220126.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-35-20220126.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• shadow-utils libsubid soname bump Iker Pedrosa
  • Re: shadow-utils libsubid soname bump Daniel Walsh
  • Re: shadow-utils libsubid soname bump Iker Pedrosa
  • Re: shadow-utils libsubid soname bump Daniel Walsh
• Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Luya Tshimbalanga
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Miro Hrončok
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Fabio Valentini
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Richard W.M. Jones
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Samuel Sieb
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Demi Marie Obenour
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
  • Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec Demi Marie Obenour
• FTBFS and ppc64le Steven A. Falco
  • Re: FTBFS and ppc64le Adam Williamson
• Intent to un-retire: uwsgi Ralf Ertzinger
• question about review process excemptions for Python 3 Felix Schwarz
  • Re: question about review process excemptions for Python 3 Miro Hrončok
  • Re: question about review process excemptions for Python 3 Felix Schwarz
• Intent to orphan gnu-efi Robbie Harwood
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi Miro Hrončok
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi František Šumšal
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi Robbie Harwood
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi Miro Hrončok
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi Robbie Harwood
  • Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi Miro Hrončok
• mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Iñaki Ucar
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Kevin Fenzi
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Michael Schwendt
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 František Šumšal
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Michael Schwendt
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 František Šumšal
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Michael Schwendt
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Luna Jernberg
  • Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25 Mohan Boddu
• new gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 build in progress Dan Horák
  • Re: new gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 build in progress Richard W.M. Jones
• What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED? Miro Hrončok
  • Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED? Stephen Gallagher
  • Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED? Miro Hrončok
  • Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED? Dan Čermák
  • Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED? Fabio Valentini
• Intent to retire w3c-markup-validator, perl-HTML-Tidy, tidyp Paul Howarth
  • Re: Intent to retire w3c-markup-validator, perl-HTML-Tidy, tidyp Sérgio Basto
  • Re: Intent to retire w3c-markup-validator, perl-HTML-Tidy, tidyp Nathanael D. Noblet
• Fedora-Cloud-34-20220125.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-35-20220125.0 compose check report Fedora compose checker
• F36 Change: Podman 4.0 (Late Self-Contained Change) Ben Cotton
  • Re: F36 Change: Podman 4.0 (Late Self-Contained Change) Timothée Ravier
• Incredible lag of koji notifications Ron Olson
  • Re: Incredible lag of koji notifications Kevin Fenzi

• Earlier messages