On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:13:19PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-02-16, 17:38 GMT, Daniel P  Berrangé wrote:
> > Yes, but that's likely a small % of overall and it is harmless 
> > if we addd BR: gcc to a few packages which don't need it 
> > - they'll be no worse off than they are today, and it can be 
> > easily removed again.
> By “adding BR: gcc” you mean committing actual changes to SPEC 
> files or creating pull requests on src.fp.o ?

I'm suggesting committing actual changes.  Creating several 1000
pull requests is just as much a burden on maintainers as expecting
them to edit several 1000 specs themselves.

|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to