Hi, I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on the list. # module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package branch name (rpms/foo's branch), another package name (rpms/bar's branch) mongodb 3.6 3.6 None nodejs 8 8 None perl 5.24 fXX fXX python3 3.6 None None python36 3.6 None master ruby 2.5 ruby-2.5 master scala 2.10 javapackages javapackages varnish 6 stream-6 stream-6 See more detail at https://pagure.io/jaruga-modules-branches I think "None" is same with "master" technically. In case of modules/ruby, we ruby team decided "the package branch name" as "ruby-X.Y" with a module name prefix against "X.Y" documented in the naming guideline. Because a package of a module A (ex. modules/ruby) can be used also in a module B (ex. modules/rubygem-rails, modules/vagrant and etc. In this case, a package branch name needs to have "ruby-X.Y", "rubygem-rails-X.Y", "vargrant-X.Y". Do you like to see some alignments for the naming? Hopefully after the discussion here in this thread, below page will be updated. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_package_branch_name Regards, Jun _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://firstname.lastname@example.org