Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 07:19 -0700, Troy Dawson a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > rpm state in EL prevents most downstreaming. Please focus efforts > > there. > > > > I don’t see how you will get any community adhesion in fixing > > downstream problems, if all your solutions are downstream focused, > > without caring about the people you want to enroll. > > > > RHELN (currently RHEL9) is supposed to look like rawhide up to > whatever the cutover point is. So, up until that point, you shouldn't > be putting RHEL conditionals in, unless you do so for EPEL packages. > > There are exceptions to this, such as the kernel, glibc, firefox, and > a handful of others. But those are the exceptions. > > After the cutover date, then again, RHELN (in the next case it will > be RHEL10) should be looking like whatever is in rawhide,
That would basically mean that ELN is a rh-only thing, since the result does not get exposed to others before cutover. Do I understand things correctly? If that is true, why would any non-rh Fedora packager care about the complexity that comes with ELN? -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
