On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26/06/20 10:19 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:57:49 +0200, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > The dnf one works fine. > > > > It does not as I have shown. Moreover it takes so much time to do dnf > > command > > completion and one always has to ctrl-c it anyway. That is because dnf > > should > > use cached results updated by cron and do not contact network during > > interactive cache queries. If one really wants most fresh data there is > > --refresh for that. > > That sounds like a good idea, and could be filed as a bug against > dnf. I'd prefer if it's optional though, because for me 'sudo dnf > install foo<TAB><TAB>' only takes seven seconds, not minutes, and > that seems reasonable to me.
Seven seconds sounds like a horrible user experience. I would lose patience and start hitting ^C after around 3s. -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| to...@pipebreaker.pl 72->| 80->| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
