On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:29 PM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > > For btrfs, it is either 'single' or 'raid0' profile for data, but > 'raid1' for metadata (the file system itself). > > I need to test it or maybe someone beats me to it by looking at the > code. But either way it's equal to or better than the current default.
For btrfs, it's raid0 data, raid1 metadata. For current default (lvm+ext4) it's linear/concat. It's straightforward to do data 'single' which is closer to the current default. But no matter what, you lose a drive and you can't boot. As a UI/UX it might need to be reevaluated what the user expects to happen when they pick two devices and automatic partitioning. I would argue it's ambiguous and it'd be better to only allow one device to be selected for auto/default path. But the current UI sorta makes this difficult, and hard to convey. You're encouraged to pick the device(s) you want first rather than a path (auto, custom, advanced), where it's legit to pick multiple devices for custom. I'm not sure anyone does multiple device auto partition installs though. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com