On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:01 PM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com>

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851783
> The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora,
> mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler
> rather than either none or bfq.
> It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none,
> but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off
> with mq-deadline.

How would one go about forcing the scheduler as to experiment to see if
there is any perceived difference between them?

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to