On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 15:01:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851783 > > The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora, > mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler > rather than either none or bfq. > > It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none, > but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off > with mq-deadline. > > Further details are in the bug, but let's discuss it on list. Thanks!
There was this thread about our systems hanging, and the workaround was to revert to mq-deadline from bfq: https://email@example.com/thread/MJJFT5AOYUFZ3SO2EDVLJSDAZMZI4HAP/#DA7RCQFIAD4Z3Q7HQBW2ELPTLPYDKJMT There are a few threads on AskFedora about systems hanging. They're not the easiest to debug but we did suggest people try switching to mq-deadline to see if it helps: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/whole-os-freezes-watching-a-video-with-mpv/6770/10 I don't know enough about this to say if it's a bug and if it has been fixed. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com