On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 16:14, Jared Dominguez <jar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:41 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel 
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On 30.06.2020 19:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> > That is the first time I have heard that. Do you have a source for that ?
>> https://github.com/intel/dptfxtract - no sources, only proprietary binaries.
>> The legal status of the extracted tables was discussed a few months ago
>> with members of the Fedora legal team. You can check archives.
> Regardless of the legality of tables output from dptfxtract, that doesn't 
> really address the fact that thermald, as is in Fedora 32 today (version 
> 1.9.1 from December) doesn't have dptfxtract (nor do later versions bundle 
> it) and results in an improvement in thermal behavior on supported systems 
> without any thermal tables in /etc/thermald.

I am going to say citation is needed here as much as Vitaly's
comments. What systems does it work with? How does it work on these
systems? What systems does it not work on? Are the various problems
from the last time this was discussed to death
been dealt with?

Stephen J Smoogen.
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to