On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 12:21, Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:06:59 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 03:16, Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > The KMail app stopped working for me today, and I realized there's > > > update to which I'd like to give a try: > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15d324f87c > > > > > > In Bodhi, the suggested command to test this update is: > > > > > > sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing > > > --advisory=FEDORA-2020-15d324f87c > > > > > > But that doesn't work because the mirrored updates-testing is not > > > yet updated. And downloading all the builds manually from Koji > > > is just too much work ATM. > > > > > > Would it be possible to enhance Bodhi so it provides the repositories > > > somewhere in the meantime, before composes are ready? > > > This is not the first time I'd found this feature very convenient. > > > > > > > A couple of things. Bodhi doesn't make composes and doesn't directly > > provide anything, so it would need to be some other tool which built and > > provided the mini-compose. This tool would need extra hardware and disk > > space as we aren't budgeted for this and will not see more disk space to > > our current infrastructure til probably 2022. > > > > Second, the Bodhi team was a temporary group to get a bodhi feature set > > over the line at a certain point in time. Those people are now assigned > to > > other projects to get container builds, flatpaks, replacing our 12 year > old > > account system, and other items into place. When those items are > completed > > those people will be assigned to fixing whatever other new tool is needed > > to get things done. > > > > If people want this, there is going to need to be a project request with > a > > detailed explanation, project scope, budget idea, what it will fix and > > various ways to weigh it against other projects, etc. I am guessing this > > would need to go to the council to work out if it is a higher need than > > some other items they expect CPE to work on. > > Ok, ok.. I fear it is out of scope for me to drive this. Just saying > what I'd found useful (and I probably filled the RFE against a wrong > component. > Sorry). > I'm fine with the 'bodhi' client auto-download and the custom script > for now ... In future I'll try to submit a PR against bodhi client, or dnf > plugins, I don't know ... and move the logic there. > > The issue is that what is needed is a better end to end definition of what the build system needs to be, and how to make it so versus a lot of requests where people come in with different things and we cram one more feral cat into the bag to make it work. I know that Kevin has tried to get a couple initiatives together overtime but not a lot of takers since it is mostly politics of horsetrading. > Pavel > > > > > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
