On 06/10/2011 03:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I understand your desire to replace everything by systemd. > I really do. syslogd, klogd, mount, fsck, and a dozen other things > I forget or don't know.
You're exaggerating. > Why does systemd link against libpam? > systemd does logins now, not /bin/login or gdm or ...? to implement PAMName= (man systemd.exec) > libattr? Does it mean it requires filesystem which implements > extended attributes? If not, why does it use libattr then? systemd uses libcap. libcap depends on libattr. > libwrap? systemd is a network application now too? to implement TCPWrapName= (man systemd.exec) > libaudit? What systemd has in common with audit? Start and stop of a service is an auditable event. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/141543.html > To be honest, I doubt the wisdom of implementing service manager > as an init process. There is no inherent reason why it has to be init - > you can run it as *a child of init*, and keep init very simple. > Then, if service manager would crash, at least it doesn't > take system down with it... systemd does not take the system down when it crashes. It catches the signal, dumps core and freezes, but does not exit. Michal -- devel mailing list email@example.com https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel