On 16/03/13 18:23, Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 15/03/2013 16:18, Nick Treleaven a écrit : >> On 13/03/2013 06:19, Lex Trotman wrote: >>> Shouldn't plugins use geany->app->configdir as the base directory as >>> perhttp://www.geany.org/manual/reference/structGeanyApp.html >>> >>> and if its Geany it can use GeanyApp.datadir as the system data >>> directory. >>> >>> >>> For this to work, the working >>>>> directory must be set correctly. The reason for the mentioned change >>>> was >>>>> this in some plugin, so I've moved the code to change the working >>>>> directory to perform it earlier in the init process, before loading >>>> plugins. >>>>> For a quick'n'dirty fix we could either move the working directory >>>>> change code move after command line parsing code but before plugin >>>>> loading or we remember the working directory at early stage to use this >>>>> when llater handling command line arguments. >>>>> Both are not nice and the real solution is to get rid of relative paths >>>>> for resources in the installation directory. >>>>> I'm going to work on this. >>> Yes it would be better to keep the working dir, ... well ... the >>> working dir:)
Ok. Just to get it clear, do we want to not change the current working directory at all? Before my change we *did* change it very late in the init process. If we decide to not change it at all, we might lock again the directory where Geany was started as in bug #2626124. As Dimitar noted in this thread, this is not as bad and uncommon as I assumed. So if we all agree on this behaviour, I'd be ok with. >> +1, it's best for plugins to use fixed paths and avoid temporarily >> changing the working dir. > > Agreed. Though, IIUC on Windows it's meant to be dynamic, so it'd Correct. > require an API the plugins could use to get the sysdir -- or make all > plugins use g_win32_get_package_installation_directory_of_module() but > it's tedious. Yes. We already have Geany's datadir in app->datadir which can also accessed by plugins though it's of no use for plugins. But it'd be easy to export something like win32_get_installation_dir() or maybe even a utility function which contructs the path for a plugin to be more convenient. > BTW if we want not to change directory anymore, I think we'd need the > attached (untested) patch which fixes the only location I found where > Geany uses relative paths. Or even apply it now (if it is tested > working) so we don't have relative path ourselves anymore. Tested and works fine. I'd vote to commit it now. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel