Wow, you found the article :-)
From what I've seen of geany, the code looks much better than some code
I've seen. It didn't take as long to familiarize myself with the basic
structure since the code files are well named and the directory
structure is far from deep ;-) One of the reasons I felt so comfortable
writing plugins for it is how much easier the code was to read. At
least you don't have perl code mixed with java, etc ;-)
I'm a bit wishy-washy on my positions in these threads. Part of me is
still healing from the Gnome disaster, and part of me likes moving
forward. I hope at least it's good food for thought.
On 11/12/2013 06:16 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
If it's the article I'm thinking of, it's this:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
But just because some guy wrote it on his blog don't make it
automatically true or apply to all projects. IMO of any code I've ever
read, Geany's is most due for some re-design/cleanup/re-factoring :)
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
