> > > Am 28.03.2014 10:00, schrieb Lex Trotman: > > On 28 March 2014 19:46, Frank Lanitz <fr...@frank.uvena.de> wrote: > >> Am 28.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Lex Trotman: > >>> The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream > >>> (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement. > >> > >> I was planning to have a look onto it Sunday (you mean #116, don't > >> you?). But this is not a feature, only kind of a bug fix ;) > > > > Yep that one, I guess its more a feature since there is no bug (in > > Geanypy), more its a bug in cppcheck :) > > > ... well.... puh... At least it's not changing any string ;) > However, will do it at the weekend. > > cheers, > Frank > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.geany.org > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here is definitely false-positeve. cppcheck was confused by a terrible define: return operator inside... Without return operator of course here could be a bug. -- Best regards, Pavel Roschin aka RPG _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
