Le 19/05/2014 07:10, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] > > Just to be clear, libpeas only automates the bridge to the *loader* > and the plugins, it does nothing for the interface between the > Geany/Scintilla functions and the plugins (and neither does Thomas' > proposal). > > That binding is independent of the loader and should be the same > effort either way so long as the libpeas loaded plugins can get the > plugindata pointer somehow. Then for C/C++/Vala its already done for > both options, and mostly done for Python2 by reusing geanypy's > bindings. > > Automated bindings to Geany/Scintilla would be a huge step forward to > supporting other languages, but it is a separate problem from the > loader.
I think that's two key points that should be clearly understood by all parts in the discussion: no matter how we load, we need a binding. An automated binding (e.g. GI) would benefit any loading approaches, and probably is the only sensible way to go, especially for more that one non-C language. Apart that, I basically +1 everything Lex said, and don't have much to add. Regards, Colomban _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
