On 08/08/14 01:23, Lex Trotman wrote: > On 8 August 2014 02:24, Enrico Tröger <enrico.troe...@uvena.de> wrote: >> On 01/08/14 13:23, Lex Trotman wrote: >>> [...] >>>>>>> Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes >>>>>>> manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe magic somewhere, the windows nightlys are passing :) >>> >>> I appears that the "magic" is that the compile options are not strict >>> enough, there are lots of implicit prototype warnings, but they are >>> not errors. >> >> As usual, I'm a bit late on the topic but I'd like to make the nightly >> builds a bit stricter especially if it helps to spoil out such problems. >> >> Any idea how to make such warnings error without using -Werror? I'm >> afraid -Werror is too hard for cross-compiling. > > This is gcc right? So you should be able to -Werror=implicit to turn > just that warning into an error. You can add more that way > -Werror=.....
Ah cool, thanks. b4n posted a similar approach, as you have probably seen. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel