On 14/06/15 18:32, Thomas Martitz wrote: > Am 14.06.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Enrico Tröger: > >> This is why :). >> I thought a couple of times of making geany.nsi.in and >> geany_private.rc.in and fill in the version number automatically. But I >> never was annoyed enough to fiddle with the 4-part version numbers used >> there. Maybe you are :). > > The last digit is always isn't it?
I guess there is a "0" missing :). For releases yes. For snapshot builds I did from time to time, I usually set it to .99 but there was no real reason for, just to make visible it is not a release. But not important or mandatory at all. >> With Waf it is actually geany-0.dll. >> But except for the installer, it should not make any difference, right? >> I don't mind which one we will use. In the end, I hope we will only have >> one build system, i.e. no more Waf, and so the name doesn't matter, I >> guess. >> Oh, while writing, I think of the linker. Does the msys2 linker handle >> libgeany.dll properly when using '-lgeany' as specific in the pkgconfig >> file? It works at least with the Mingw linker and Waf. >> >> > > > libgeany-0.dll works just fine. Cool! Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
