Am 07.01.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Jiří Techet:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz <ku...@rockbox.org
<mailto:ku...@rockbox.org>> wrote:
Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at
least for .h
headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the
place -- even,
simply look in Scintilla's source tree.
+1 for having the headers parsed/lexed by the C++ parser (with
sources it may be a bit dangerous and typically the sources
have the right C++ extension).
Not replying to Jiří specifically.
-1. .h is legitimately a C, it's just that many people get it
wrong. And I don't want C++ keywords highlighted in C headers
while they are not highlighted it C source files. This is just
confusing.
I agree with Matthew here - I think the "damage" caused by parsing C
headers with the C++ parser/lexer is much smaller than vice versa.
Actually a few months back a user of my ProjectOrganizer plugin wrote
me just because of that - he had a C++ project with "h" headers and
was surprised that tag generation didn't work for him.
I created (a highly sophisticated) pull request here:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/857
Power users can always add *.h back to C types but I think having it
in C++ is a better default.
Yes you're only changing the default. I just stated my opionion and
won't try to block the change. Go a head if you prefer.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
