2009/1/8 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]>: >> Personally I would never implement exotic URI headers. This is >> something that should be dropped from RFC 3261 ASAP. >> Those super-exotic "features" are fully useless and add >> extra-complexity. Why should a header be matched when comparing an >> URI? >> > > Fully agree. I haven't seen URIs with headers, but they might be somewhere > inside IMS/Telco routing...
I've seen some URI's containing headers in some hyper-xtra-exotic drafts that will be NEVER implemented, of course. They are things like a server receiving a request with a special body full of URI's containing headers. So the server creates a request for each URI and adds the URI headers as request headers. This pathetic feature (written by somebody obviously not interested in its implementation but in writting a paper in which his name appears) would be never a task for a proxy but for a exotic server. I think a proxy should never care about useless URI headers. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
