Tridge, On Jun 26, 2007, at 9:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Alternatively, talk to Wayne Davison about rsync 3.0. One of the core > things that brings is lower memory usage (essentially automating the > breakup into directory trees that I mentioned above).
thanks for chiming in. Do you (or Wayne) think that given the state of rsync 3.0 _right now_, it's more promising to pursue that or rsync 2.x? Keep in mind also that the number of files we're dealing with in our OS images is very significantly (a magnitude or two) smaller than a normal UNIX desktop. We have a total of 1GB flash, and our target for OS size is <=150MB initially and eventually <=100MB. I expect most OS updates would change a relatively small percentage of that and suspect rsync would deal with it, even on our machines, without any problem. Cheers, -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
