On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 10:15 -0700, Ronak Chokshi wrote: > True. Please treat our suggestions of builds only as recommendations. > The final decision of which build should be used for the major > milestones should come from within OLPC based on the accomplishments > planned for that milestone. This is the model we usually follow with > most of our other customers/projects as well.
Ok, I was under the impression that we had to get sign-off for any CozyBit built firmware before CozyBit could give it to us, before we could put it in builds. Is that invalid, or has that changed? Dan > > > Thanks > > Ronak > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michail Bletsas > Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 6:11 AM > To: Dan Williams > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kim Quirk; OLPC Developer's List; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Testing] Build 472 - testing > > > > > > No we don't.... > > M. > > > > > > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 06/30/2007 11:37 PM > > > To > > > Kim Quirk > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > cc > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], "OLPC Developer's List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject > > > Re: [Testing] > Build 472 - > testing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 08:10 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote: > > It looks like we may need/want to get the latest Marvell firmware > and > > all known flag day updates into the build on Monday (if possible). > At > > some point we just have to take the hit and ask everyone to upgrade, > > laptops and servers. > > > > As you mention, Dan, we need to do this in Cambridge first... so > maybe > > this should be in Monday's build. I know we have the Marvell > firmware > > (or can get it). Is there anything outstanding that we are still > > waiting on to have this flag day? > > We need to get Ronak's sign-off on any firmware that we plan to put in > public builds. That can take a few days, though sometimes it's quick. > > Dan > > > > Is there a reason NOT to do this as soon as possible? > > > > Thanks, > > Kim > > > > On 6/30/07, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 21:37 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:23 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote: > > > > Test Groups, > > > > Build 472 is available, but the biggest problem is that > it > > doesn't get > > > > on the mesh or infrastructure AP. Some activities are > > working and > > > > there is more to see in the Journal than the previous > > build. > > > > > > > > I'm hoping that we can get another build today with the > > network > > > > problem fixed since that would be important for our > > 'Release Candidate > > > > 1'. Today's milestone is to get to RC1 which has most of > > the basic > > > > functionality that was available in 406 builds. If we > can > > get the mesh > > > > connecting again, that would be great! > > > > > > > > Test release notes: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_Group_Release_Notes > > > > (Anyone can add notes about this release page -- please > > do) > > > > > > I couldn't fix the mesh issues with the current > > NetworkManager so I have > > > backtracked to an earlier working version in build478. > This > > one gets on > > > the mesh and also on AP points. > > > > > > > > > http://olpc.download.redhat.com/olpc/streams/development/build478/ > > > > So thinking about it again, we don't expect the new svn2621 > NM > > bits to > > work with any existing mesh networks because the server > > software and > > hardware needs to change. > > > > We have to have a flag day in Cambridge too before we can > get > > the new NM > > automeshing bits, because the new bits aren't compatible > with > > the old > > bits on the server side. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Testing mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing > > > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel