On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > It wasn't obvious how to coerce the code to do 256-bit truncated > Whirlpool, so I don't have a number for that.
Whirlpool doesn't matter for the general boot case anyway. Looks like if we go with SHA-256 and ECC-256 we can do the verification in about 0.6 seconds, which is fine by me. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
