for what it is worth, I put all of the keyboard images into the public domain.
-walter On 10/16/07, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/15/07, Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian's criticisms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (and > > derivatives) as a Free Software license can be found here: > > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html > > That's for version 2.0. Version's 3 and 2.5 have dealt a lot with > these kind of criticism and attempted to fix the problems. I'd say > most of the problems should be fixed by now. > > > It's also a bad idea to recommend "a Creative Commons license" without > > explicitly specifying which one > > Yes. Creative Commons recommends stating something similar to "This > work is under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License", and then > add the link to the license if it's a digital thing, or display the > "send a letter to CC to get a copy of license" if it's non-digital. > > Attribution is akin to new BSD or MIT. Attribution-ShareAlike is more > like the GPL. NC or ND should not be used here. > > -Ivo > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > -- Walter Bender One Laptop per Child http://laptop.org _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
