John Watlington wrote: > Quanta wants assurance that the software workaround which was broken in > #4479 is fixed. > Richard's testing is necessary to confirm this. It is also essential > that the kernel fix > which is theoretically the only difference between 624 and 625 be part > of the production > test code to further confirm this. If Quanta sees this problem AT ALL > in the production > testing, there will be pressure to halt until further hardware/software > fixes are found.
I'm getting a slightly different story. I was trying to meet with people yesterday to discuss the whole mfg testing procedure so I knew what was going on and what I would need to do to get the new kernel into the Run-In image. Arnold tells me that he thinks its too late to get the DCON workaround kernel into the Run-In image. He suggestion was that if we see a DCON problem that we pull the machine out of the rack, update the kernel and then re-add it back into the testing. -- Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> One Laptop Per Child _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
