On Nov 7, 2007, at 16:52 , Michael Stone wrote: > > $SAR/instance seems like a safer place to me because there will be no > concurrency issues, but I have no plans to start the Apocalyse if > someone tries to check in a file from $SAR/data. :)
Okay, makes it simpler for me. > Incidentally, how do you feel about the claim that $SAR/conf is > superfluous and should be removed in favor of just using $SAR/data for > persistent non-DS data? I don't really have an opinion - I don't need it now, and it could be added later if it turns out to be desirable. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel