> Yeah. The OpenSolaris Governing Board voted unaminously earlier this > year that it would be against that community's interests to dual-license > OpenSolaris under CDDL/GPL, so such a move is certainly not a matter of > "go ahead and get around to".
The OGB membership changes (elections are 'soon', even, for OGB seats). Ideas change. And there are quite a few reasons other than "we don't want to share" behind those sorts of moves on the part of OpenSolaris. (Folks really *do* want to share -- but there is a large amount of fear that people in the Linux distro community will completely screw things up by, e.g., forking the code in unwise ways.) > (And they were talking about GPLv3, not GPLv2, which is the start of > another long mail thread. Let's not and pretend we did.) Yes, let's not. :-) --e _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
