On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:23:30PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > > OFW expects %eax to be the first parameter in callbacks. Other than this, > > I assumed -mregparm is a useful size optimization. Is that not it? Why > > do we have it on i386-pc then? > > On i386-pc the size restrictions are more important. On OF the binary > is loaded from the filesystem.
We need at least -mregparm=1. Does it make sense to move from 3 to 1 ? I think it's better to stay at 3 for consistency. > >> Why do you do this? Isn't this information available in native byte order? > > > > See my other mail about IEEE-1275 and endianess. > > Which subject? "[PATCH] fix endianess in IEEE-1275 integer properties" -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel