Chris Hager wrote: > Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > >> I don't see why breaking this up by tags (some of which can be things like >> "PG13") isn't a good enough solution. We all know kids will seek this stuff >> out no matter what, lets at least do it in a controlled way. >> >> > The MPAA uses those ratings: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PG13#Ratings) > > - G (General Audience - all ages admitted) > - PG (Parental guidance suggested - might not be suitable for children)) > - PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned - might be inappropriate for < 13 years) > - R (Restricted - < 17 years requires parent or adult guardian) > - NC-17 (No children under 17) > > Basically, we could introduce this ratings as tags on [[Activities]]. > Xo-get could list only 'G'-rated Activities by default, and users can > then 'enable' all other somewhere in the application (preferences, ...). >
Or perhaps a bit lighther version: - G (General Audience) (without tag) - M (Mature material, not recommendet for people under ... years of age) Is there a need for more than those two ratings right now? For xo-get, it would be nice to make it into a tag like R:[Rating], for example R:M for M-rated Activities. And we might suppose, Activities without rating-tags are 'G'-rated. Chris _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
