On Jan 21, 2008 1:31 PM, Antoine van Gelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Albert Cahalan wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2008 12:27 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (b) as has been pointed out repeatedly, CSound is an open standard > >> (which incidentally predates the MIDI standard). > > > > It may be open, but it isn't much of a standard. > > I've only found one implementation, csound itself. > > There are no hardware implementations. > > http://www.epigon.in/pdf/studyRoom1.pdf > > Might help a little to address your issues above ?
I think that is an excellent example what I suggested. They used csound code to implement 64-voice MIDI. No mention is made of using the csound data formats. > As a musician, I don't know of anything else that comes close - and that > includes some pretty expensive proprietary systems with pretty > blinged-out user interfaces! > > Please don't make me have to go back to midi :) You must mean "bad MIDI engines" or similar, because your csound example was in fact MIDI. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
