Benjamin, Yanni, If I understand you correctly, I believe that, in the end, what you are proposing is what the avahi should do normally. It keeps soft state data about the neighbours.
On Feb 19, 2008 3:32 PM, Giannis Galanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the protocol to be healthy, > > not only you have to wake every 10min to send your request, > but you have to be awake to receive the others' requests. > > These are again 10min, but have different offsets. Thats why I believe the > only way would be to have 10off - 10on. > > Still, due to bug 5501, if you miss a single request, u are prone to be > deleted right away. > > So 10ff-10on might not work either. > > In fact the although the requests are every 10min, the icon will hold for > 30min in total until it is deleted. > Bug 5501, however, will delete the entry if within the timeframe, a new > host arrives. > > > > > On Feb 19, 2008 1:19 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 13:11 -0500, Giannis Galanis wrote: > > > > > > > > The wakeup required is T minutes for every T minutes. > > > Actually you would need to be awake for >T minutes > > > and suspended for <T minutes to be sure u are ok. > > > > > > So for T=10min, as in this case: > > > 9off, 11on, 9 off, 11on > > > > > > but this is not very effective in terms of suspend/resume > > > > I meant to imply that this would work only if the wireless hardware > > wakes up the system for every broadcast. > > > > --Ben > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
