Morgan Collett wrote: > Ivan Krstić wrote: >> On Feb 26, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: >>> Does sugar make any assumptions about the size of the key? IOW can we >>> instead of removing the key completely, use a smaller key? >> >> As I've told daf, smcv et al many months ago in Boston, there's no point >> in advertising the whole key. Advertising a digest is enough as long as >> nodes support an on-demand operation that returns their whole key. > > As long as Sugar gets a unique value as the key, nothing will break (for > very short term changes for testing...) so you could just replace the > key in the TXT record with its hash.
I've logged #6572 against Presence Service with a patch, to replace the public key with its sha1 hash. Works in jhbuild. Morgan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
