On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Jean Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mmm... After a couple of flags raised and an approval from Jim from a > couple of weeks ago (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6521), the old > TamTam versions are still being used in the builds.
Probably just an oversight. I didn't see TamTam listed in my perusal of update.1 bugs, but admittedly I didn't scrutinize the bugs assigned to ApprovalForUpdate or dgilmore. (Apparently I should have.) Did you follow the update.1 approval process to the letter? If not, make sure you've done so (including answering any questions left by Dennis or Jim; Dennis doesn't like to be forced to guess when he pulls things into update.1). In any case, please reply to the 'state of update.1' thread naming 6521 as remaining work to be done, so that we keep everyone synchronized (even if they don't have time to read every thread on devel@). (It appears that you have followed the update.1 process to the letter; please consider the bulk of my mail just a gentle reminder to others about how I would like omissions in the current "state of update.1" to be addressed. For those others on devel@: Update.1 process: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Update.1_process ) --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
