Hmm, yesterday I executed free after launching some activities and got this results:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-March/004650.html Am I very wrong to think that we can save 3.6MB per python activity instance? Tomeu On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:21 PM, NoiseEHC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is the problem that every page will be modified (and so copied) if it > contains a reference count so the metadata effectively cannot be shared. > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-September/006617.html > Also mentioned in (point 9.) > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/community-news/2007-February/000043.html > > > > > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:50 PM, NoiseEHC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Could somebody answer these questions? > >> 1. What is the status of zlib -> lzo transition in jffs2? > >> 2. What is the status of the new X architecture? (The name is DRM but I > >> am not sure.) > >> 3. What is the status of the shared page python stuff? Will the > >> reference count problem will be solved in Python 3.0? Will it be > >> released in the foreseeable future? > >> > > > > Can you explain what's that "reference count problem" or give any pointer? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tomeu > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
