That's the big on/off switch for all isolation. Sugar also independently decides to turn off isolation for a small number of activities listed in its source code.
Michael On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:33:36PM -0700, Carol Lerche wrote: > Is this the reason that Bryan Berry in Nepal found that Tux Paint did not > work, and is the instruction given here: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Test_Config_Notes&action=edit§ion=29 > > still the correct way to disable isolation? > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Mikus Grinbergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > in a description of how non-sugar apps need some help to run > > > > properly under sugar, the current front page of OLPC News > > > > contains the following quote: > > > > > > > > "... there is some discussion that Update 1, a forthcoming > > > > upgrade to Sugar, will break all existing wrappers, and > > > > current Activities will need to be re-coded and re-wrapped." > > > > > > I assumed that what's behind this is the introduction of rainbow. > > > [I'm not sure of the date of the transition to rainbow, but perhaps > > > G1G1 participants might be exposed to it when installing Update.1] > > > > You are right looks like isolation has been enabled by default only > > starting from Update.1. > > > > Marco > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > > > > > -- > "Always do right," said Mark Twain. "This will gratify some people and > astonish the rest." > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
