On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After having worked in projects with many schemes, I
> find that the best communicator is a 3-part release name x.y.z
> where...
Which is what Richard is saying too, except he is clearer ;-)
For builds that are custom in some way ("Mexico" as mentioned above),
the customisation has to be last, so
- 1.0.33
- 1.0.33-Mexico
is clear. As for a name, I would say XOOS or XO-OS. That would make my
ISOs XS-OS, which makes sense. In both cases, it is a complete OS
image. Someone may package the subset that is Sugar and its apps
separately.
Therefore we can later say that XOOS-1.0.33 and XSOS-0.5.3 have been
tested together, and that carries a ton of information that, for
anyone following the versioning conventions used all around, is easy
to decompress and interpret. For example, if you are using XOOS-1.0.32
with XSOS-0.5.3 you probably need not worry, and in any case, a quick
read of the changelog for XOOS-1.0.33 will show you if any bugfix is
desirable to you.
cheers,
martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
