On 24.04.2008, at 22:56, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> you check the keep property before you set it, and do not touch it >> if you >> are not going to change it. > > That does in fact sound like a reasonable way to handle it. It > doesn't require an extra time around "the loop"....it simply stops it > directly at the signal handler for the KeepIcon change event by not > overwriting with the same value. Don't I feel stupid now....
I'd even consider it a bug if overwriting a property with the same value would emit a change event - but maybe this is how the framework works? - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
