On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:32 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Sugar design guidelines. > > Windows developers would port existing applications (Word, for > example) and provide simplified interfaces matching the Sugar UI > guidelines, but these activities would not share any code or > interoperate in any way with Sugar/GNU/Linux. The collaboration and > other features itemized below would exist in Sugar/Windows only to the > extent to which the original or newly-written applications supported > them: native Word collaboration via a SharePoint server, for example, > would replace the Abiword-based peer-to-peer collaboration of > Sugar/GNU/Linux. I think that one option that should not be discounted is the stack Sugar/GNU/Windows. In this case you could keep ABI Word (using the Win32 version) and other open source collaboration tools instead of implementing what Nicholas would call bloat-ware (Share point is probably the ugliest CMS you could deploy - a simple wiki would work tons better ;). Ludovic
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
