Indeed, that is one of the virtues of Squeak. Python was somewhat of a compromise in this respect, but it has the virtual that opens up ready access to most of the rest of the GNU/Linux world.
Both are pretty friendly development environments. It is probably easier to design an onion-like view source in Squeak, but Chris Ball's efforts in Pippy are pretty rich as well. Alas, this is a feature that, as has already been mentioned, hasn't had enough time and attention yet. It'd be nice to "architect" what view source means in these different environments to provide a starting point for developers as per the original post in this thread. regards. -waltr On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's the best path for making an activity 'view source' friendly? >> Reverse engineering from Chat, which is? Some other way? > > Perhaps you could write it in Squeak. The entire dynamic and static > state and environment including source code is readily available for > "viewing" to the user, and you can even make on-the-fly changes. > > -- Yoshiki > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel