On 30.05.2008, at 19:38, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > In any case, the best response is clear: continue to work on the Linux > software stack and ensure that it is simply better than the Windows > alternative. I've heard a lot of sturm und drang, but am saddened > that I haven't seen much help from those shouting in actually making > Sugar/Linux more competitive: > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5452 > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5451 > (as well as the task lists I've previously posted at: > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-May/014539.html (end > of message) > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-May/0136 )
+5 on that. Just being free and open doesn't cut it, it actually has to be at least as good as the proprietary software for the users. Let's hope some more folk from the peanut gallery joins us down here in the arena. We need people like Albert who do both - criticize *and* contribute, like he did with libsugarize which still is the simplest thing to get regular apps running as an activity. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
