On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C. Scott Ananian wrote: > > Last I checked, Poly wasn't an employee of OLPC. > I don't think this is a valid argument either: Not being an employee of OLPC does not mean I 'm willing to waste my > time on something OLPC has no interest in. Like most other volunteers, > work at OLPC is interesting because it's technically challenging and > globally significant. If the work is not in OLPC's radar of interest, > then something's wrong and it should be discussed. > I'm glad you said this; I was going to chime in with the same thought. Providing a global sense of significance and priority -- through accurate and complete transmission of feedback, and through review of all ideas being offered or tested -- is one of the most valuable things OLPC can offer its contributors and supporters. SJ
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
