On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I thought I covered this scenario quite thoroughly; cerebro enabled >> about 70 laptops to chat in a simple mesh, even without using an access >> point or a school server. I got no useful comments, nor was there any >> significant interest to plan for sugar integration, so I think it's time >> to move forward with a different test. > > I still don't understand what's in the path to integrate cerebro into > sugar. You proposed to change the API and of course you were asked to > justify this. > > Seems to me like now everybody agrees on coding a cerebro connection > manager, which would bring cerebro's benefits without having to change > the API. > > What's the problem?
Yeah. There is interest to integrate cerebro. It's just very unclear (to me at least) what's the path to get there... Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
