We are discussing this and the best use of resources to get to 8.2.0 and beyond. There will be many more discussions. I would like to figure out how to make progress on cerebro.
Kim On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert McQueen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ricardo Carrano wrote: > > We need Jabber to be working too. For the infra scenario in the schools > to work. > > But if we consider Cerebro an important part of our future (at least I > > do) we should dedicate more attention to it. I don't know about the > > arrangements between OLPC and Collabora. It seems to be implied that > > if Collabora works in the Jabber front it won't be able to work in > > Cerebro. Is that the case? Really? > > Not really, no, we'd be happy to work on using Cerebro to implement the > Telepathy APIs. We do however have a limited amount of resources to > dedicate to on our work for OLPC, and they are spent as directed by the > management at 1CC, as represented to us by Michael Stone. Currently the > main priority for us is implementation of the XMPP server component > (Gadget) to handle activity/buddy discovery and hence allow greater > numbers of users on one XMPP server, and allow us to consider other XMPP > daemons besides ejabberd. > > It's my opinion that we should also dedicate some of our resources to > working on Telepathy <-> Cerebro integration too, so that we can make > some comparisons and see how well the existing activities and UIs behave > on a hopefully more mesh-friendly backend. We're currently discussing > with Michael and the folks at 1CC how/when we can make this happen. > > Regards, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
