Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:23 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : > >> >> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > >> >> > Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut > >> >> > in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work > >> >> > in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. > >> >> > >> >> Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right > >> >> now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes > >> >> sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem > >> >> with you doing enabling it. > >> > > >> > Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO > >> > security model (Rainbow). > >> > Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). > >> > >> I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep > >> everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow > >> specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, > >> if built with --enable-olpc? > > > > Then it would be build time option and F9 users will have the patch > > applied anyway (which is not really a good idea). > > Can we make it a runtime option?
We certainly don't want to add a CM parameter for this. We could eventually check an env variable but I'm not convince that's a so good idea as these workarounds are very very hackish. Sjoerd, Daf: Thoughts? G. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel