I think Victor would be very happy to have a single spec file that
covers both the subset and full csound builds....
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:53 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2008, Jim Gettys wrote:
> > Dennis:
> >
> > OLPC csound is an *exact* formal *subset* of full csound-5 built from
> > the same sources as csound-5.
> >
> > It gets rid of tk/tcl dependency we don't want to carry in csound....
> > - Jim
> There are much better ways to achieve that goal. than what was done. but
> its
> too late now. I'm working on defining some macros in totem right now so we
> can always take the latest fedora spec, change some 0's to 1's and build a
> much more minimalistic totem that's suitable for us. What is done is done
> now.
>
> > On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 17:25 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > On Sunday 29 June 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > > > Am 30.06.2008 um 00:05 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> > > > > On Sunday 29 June 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > > > >> I reanimated my script that shows differences between the latest
> > > > >> joyride and candidate builds:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/olpc3-joyride.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ... and in particular added a section to easily see what packages
> > > > >> are in olpc3 and not in joyride, and vice versa.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> There are not only differences in package versions, but also in
> > > > >> which packages are in. I wondered, for example, why csound is
> > > > >> missing from joyride ...
> > > > >
> > > > > a second copy of csound landed in fedora as olpcsound. it is built
> > > > > specifically for olpc and is in joyride.
> > > >
> > > > If it was named csound-olpc that would have been more obvious ...
> > > >
> > > > - Bert -
> > >
> > > Yes, first i heard of it was when i was asked to switch out csound and
> > > csound- python for olpcsound. Had i been asked before hand i could have
> > > suggested a way that the csound spec could have produced csound
> > > csound-python and csound- olpc. but what is done is done. I personally
> > > don't like anything being called olpc-foo, I think we should write code
> > > that is useful outside of OLPC, useful to the whole world. In which case
> > > the naming is really a poor choice.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel@lists.laptop.org
> > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One Laptop Per Child
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
