-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 C. Scott Ananian wrote: | On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> We could add many more of the missing features to Browse if all the |> developers weren't so busy with the rest of Sugar. Also, although most |> of the sugar developers have occasionally hacked on Browse, we are far |> from experts in the big piece of code that Mozilla is. | | This was my original point. We either have sufficient resources to | develop our own browser, or we don't. I think it will (in the end) be | more efficient to develop small Firefox extensions to support Journal | integration and collaboration, rather than taxing the sugar developers | with an attempt to (basically) reimplement large parts of firefox.
I disagree. I expect that these two options will require a very similar amount of code... but one of them is already largely complete (if beta), while the other is hypothetical. Browse a custom UI on XULRunner, with brand-new code for sharing and datastore access. Moving that code into extensions doesn't reduce the amount of code. Neither of these scenarios is more "our own browser" than the other. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhzsIgACgkQUJT6e6HFtqRclQCfRSZXm2NgTztwVMnXMhcW4LEL CAEAoIj2t4FVX0PRqcjdAVm0PYLLHVl3 =crMM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel