On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Hi All, Here's the requirement for Uruguay NAND full situation. > > Here's my proposal: > > * Uruguay should use something like the script I proposed, as well as > the visible warnings on disk full that they already have. > > * For 8.2, we should find causes of failure to boot on low disk space. > If there are few of them, we should fix them. > > * Once we get to the point where we always get to Sugar and the > Journal in disk-full, we should have the Journal force the user > to delete something by showing a list of size-sorted entries and > prompting for deletion. > > * If there *aren't* few of them or we can't fix them, we should > instead use a non-Sugar GUI for performing the deletion. > > * To repeat, the above "full fix" would live in the 8.2 branch, > and not be backported to 656 as part of this solution.
cjb: +1 erikg's desire notwithstanding, i don't think unionfs is (a) a good thing to add to our kernel (I reviewed the current unionfs alternatives a few months ago, and the supported ones aren't flash-friendly, and vice-versa), or (b) the quickest way to get to the solution cjb describes above. --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
