On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Stone wrote: >> After mild provocation, Marco and Tomeu asked me to publish some of my >> reactions to sugar's architecture, design, and implementation. Here are >> a few initial comments. >> >> 1) Sugar could better hold contributors if it (and its web presence) >> were designed to be extended and to highlight external contributions.
One hint from Robert about how the project is seen by FOSS people: Jul 19 15:43:38 <tomeu> Robot101: thanks for remembering the gnome mobile people that we are still alive Jul 19 15:43:57 <tomeu> would have been great to be at guadec :/ Jul 19 15:44:47 <Robot101> yeah they were somehow talking about OLPC as dead and failed, I had to give them some re-schooling Would you spend much time on a dead and failed project? Note that the GNOME Mobile people are not supposed to be the kind of people that know about OLPC only from NBC News. About the rest, Michael's post makes me think he believes that we are very proud of our work. Just for the record, I think my work at OLPC is crap and I would have refused to deliver so poor quality in any commercial project (in case any future employer is reading this.) I have kept going on with this craziness because I expected that at some point the promises of more resources would be fulfilled. If our only plan is to blame the Sugar developers for not being able to attract more developers for free... It may not be worth the effort. Best regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
