On 4 Aug 2008, at 04:02, Albert Cahalan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> This is rather unfair. I take it you've just filled up all >> available space >> and jffs2 is now thrashing (as would happen on almost any file >> system)? > > "df -m ." reports 1024 blocks, 854 used, 171 available, 84% used. > "du -ms ." in the "store" directory reports 195 megabytes.
Here's my matching XO's figures just for comparison: df -m reports 1024 blocks, 479 used, 546 available, 47% used. du -ms in the datastore directory reports 83Mb I'm assuming the patterns of file/block use may also be a significant speed factor (not just total available space), as jffs2 has some interesting behaviours to deal with flash wear level and other need flash maintenance. --Gary _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
